Skip to main content

Author: isoadmin

Why Window Selection is Vital for an Accurate Energy Rating

Wayne Floyd – Director of Floyd Energy

Why window selection is vital for an accurate energy rating

How much emphasis should be on window selection when assessing a building design for a 6+ Star Energy Rating Report?

For us at Floyd Energy®, the type of windows selected in a design is one of the first considerations to ensuring we deliver an accurate energy rating that will result in a house/building that is energy efficient, has thermal comfort and saves on long term occupier costs.

Watch any of the multitude of home design and improvement TV shows and it would be easy to believe that delivering on building sustainability is as simple as installing double glazed windows. But, for an expert in thermal performance, we know it is never as simple as this.

When selecting windows for a project, consideration needs to be given to the contribution of the window to both the heating and cooling loads of each design.

As an example, clear double glazing keeps in thermal warmth in winter but it does the same in summer, meaning a warmer building in both winter and summer. Not ideal for the occupier’s thermal comfort year round; nor for their cost of living.

Whereas a double glazed window which has a low e coating, either soft or hard on surface 2 or 3, will reduce the amount of heat entering the building in summer and also reduce internal heat losses in winter.

We understand quality window selection is often the expensive option for a development and can be difficult to explain to the client, but it’s an Energy Rater’s job to communicate the upfront expense will deliver long term savings and comfort that will (also) likely contribute to a more valuable building in the future.

And, beyond the long term results, accurate assessment of windows as part of an Energy Rating Report means a document that’s not only compliant for a building permit, but buildable.

Too often we see generic window choices in a rating report, without consideration given to operating type and often chosen to manipulate data to generate a 6+ star rating. The result being windows that are difficult (or even impossible) to source for the build – adding hidden expense in building delays and needing second a rating.

And once the window selection is changed, the 6 Star rating quickly disappears to a non-compliant build.

Floyd Energy® wants to lead the building industry to have the courage and foresight to implement best practice and stand by the principle that profit should never be at the cost of occupiers’ wellbeing, safety and comfort. It should not be at the cost of great design and quality buildings.

Profits should not come at the cost of the humans who will occupy the space.

What’s the adage? You have to spend money to make money…

Don’t get us wrong, we understand budget can be limited for developments; we work with clients where some sustainability and design features must be compromised and there are alternatives. These compromises may include recommending the use of a different floor slab that’s more cost effective than high quality windows.

Ultimately we need to educate on the importance of window selection to building sustainability, energy efficiency and thermal comfort. Energy Raters need to be better than handing over a document that leads to low quality buildings that are leading to poor occupier health, comfort, high energy bill costs and, sometimes, more dangerous repercussions.

www.Floyd Energy.com.au

Strategies for Non-ideal Sites/Design Performance Issues

Few buildings are located on perfect sites, with exactly the right amount of solar access, ideal breezes and natural ventilation and protection from all negative elements of the climate. Unfortunately, some people seem to think that if a building can’t be sited perfectly, there is no point attempting any kind of effective passive solar or energy efficient design. But this attitude fails to see that any passive design elements that can be used in a building will help to make a difference to the building’s thermal performance and improve its energy efficiency.

For example, just including appropriately sized eaves will control the amount of solar radiation that enters a home and therefore make it much more comfortable for its occupants. There is a range of design options available to improve a building’s thermal performance and each can have benefits in particular situations. The following table provides a short list of common design issues, and possible solutions which might offset the energy-efficiency disadvantages.

Issue Potential solution
Owner wants large windows with east/west view Moveable shading, for example louvres, blinds, roller blinds or tracked shutters.
Best would be moveable louvred options, which do not interfere with ventilation in hot conditions
Multi-unit building with double loaded corridor Best to use east/west orientation and moveable shading, as described above.
Consider widening the plan form to allow increased distance between ventilation openings
Insufficient solar access in a building in a heating climate Reduce mass levels, which will just increase the cost of the building for little benefit.
Increase insulation to all elements, for example:
– Use low E glass, insulated frames (e.g. thermally broken timber/UPVC), and double glazing
– Reduce the window area, particularly high windows under eaves or other shading
– Install underfloor insulation
– Install insulation in roof/ceiling and walls
– In full brick or block walls, use internal plasterboard finish with insulation between the battens
North facing plan showing as under-heated Reduce horizontal overhangs.
Increase window area
Building is overheating generally Check that shading to north windows is adequate.
Consider reducing east/west window area, and/or adding additional vertical moveable or correctly angled louvre shading.
Check insulation levels to all elements are adequate, particularly the roof.
Review ventilation in the building, and consider increasing the size of openings or streamlining air pathways.
Consider adding more thermal mass or better access to the existing mass, e.g. tiling slab on ground, or rendering rather than plasterboard to internal brick.If the above measures are not enough:
Check the overall window area compared to the floor area to ensure that it is within the suggested limits.
Check the overall wall area compared to plan area
Building is under-heating generally See issues 3 and 4 above plus:
Reduce mass levels and increase insulation, as described for issue 3 above.
Increase window area and reduce horizontal overhangs, as described for issue 4 above.
Add at least one properly shaded north window area.If the above measures are not enough:
Check the overall window area compared to the floor area to ensure that it is within the suggested limits.
Check the overall wall area compared to plan area